<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Vernon &#38; Ginsburg, LLP News &#187; Appellate Division</title>
	<atom:link href="http://vernonginsburg.com/news/tag/appellate-division/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://vernonginsburg.com/news</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Jun 2010 16:17:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>1725 v. Block</title>
		<link>http://vernonginsburg.com/news/1725-v-block/</link>
		<comments>http://vernonginsburg.com/news/1725-v-block/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2009 19:22:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1725 v Block]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[27-2009.1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appellate Division]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[co-ops]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rent stabilization]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vernonginsburg.com/news/?p=14</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The firm recently prevailed at the Appellate Division, helping secure rights for rent-stabilized tenants in a non-eviction co-op to have a companion animals. 1725 v. Block. The Appellate Division ruled that under the three-month rule (§27-2009.1 of the Administrative Code of the City of New York) the knowledge of on-site employees that provide services to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The firm recently prevailed at the Appellate Division, helping secure rights for rent-stabilized tenants in a non-eviction co-op to have a companion animals. <a rel="external" href="http://www.nycourts.gov/reporter/3dseries/2009/2009_05983.htm"><em>1725 v. Block</em></a>. The Appellate Division ruled that under the three-month rule (§27-2009.1 of the Administrative Code of the City of New York) the knowledge of on-site employees that provide services to both co-op unit owners and rent-regulated tenants alike is sufficient to trigger a waiver of a no-pet clause and allow the rent-regulated tenants to keep their companion animal. The case cited the firm’s argument that the General Business Law §352-eeee, concerning managing agents in a non-eviction co-op, supports a finding that the knowledge of the on-site employees in a co-op triggers a waiver for regulated tenants under §27-2009.1. The rent-stabilized tenants in <em>Block</em> hired Vernon &amp; Ginsburg, LLP after a defeat in the lower court. Our firm prevailed in appeals at both the Appellate Term and Appellate Division.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://vernonginsburg.com/news/1725-v-block/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
