Press
Archives
June 2011
June 2010
March 2010
February 2010
December 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
February 2009
Tags
27-2009.1
1725 v Block
Animal Legal Defense Fund
Apartment Alteration
Appelate Division
Appelate Term
Babeli v 7-11 East 13th Street Corp
Brooklyn Law School
Careers
CLE
Co-Ops
Companion Animals
Commercial Real Estate
Commercial Real Estate Closings
Condos
Condo Groups
Condo Unit Owners
Coop Groups
Coop Unit Owners
Court Of Appeals
CPLR 213
David Paterson
Disability
Emotional Support Animals
J-51
Luxury Deregulation
NYS Senate
Real Estate Closings
Reasonable Accomodation
Rent Control
Rent Stabilization
Representation Of The Disabled
Residential Real Estate
Roberts v Tishman Speyer
Service Animals
Statute Of Limitations
Tenant Rights
Urstadt Law
News
1725 V. BLOCK
August 26th, 2009 The firm recently prevailed at the Appellate Division, helping secure rights for rent-stabilized tenants in a non-eviction co-op to have a companion animals. 1725 v. Block. The Appellate Division ruled that under the three-month rule (§27-2009.1 of the Administrative Code of the City of New York) the knowledge of on-site employees that provide services to both co-op unit owners and rent-regulated tenants alike is sufficient to trigger a waiver of a no-pet clause and allow the rent-regulated tenants to keep their companion animal. The case cited the firm’s argument that the General Business Law §352-eeee, concerning managing agents in a non-eviction co-op, supports a finding that the knowledge of the on-site employees in a co-op triggers a waiver for regulated tenants under §27-2009.1. The rent-stabilized tenants in Block hired Vernon & Ginsburg, LLP after a defeat in the lower court. Our firm prevailed in appeals at both the Appellate Term and Appellate Division.