Press
Archives
June 2011
June 2010
March 2010
February 2010
December 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
February 2009
Tags
27-2009.1
1725 v Block
Animal Legal Defense Fund
Apartment Alteration
Appelate Division
Appelate Term
Babeli v 7-11 East 13th Street Corp
Brooklyn Law School
Careers
CLE
Co-Ops
Companion Animals
Commercial Real Estate
Commercial Real Estate Closings
Condos
Condo Groups
Condo Unit Owners
Coop Groups
Coop Unit Owners
Court Of Appeals
CPLR 213
David Paterson
Disability
Emotional Support Animals
J-51
Luxury Deregulation
NYS Senate
Real Estate Closings
Reasonable Accomodation
Rent Control
Rent Stabilization
Representation Of The Disabled
Residential Real Estate
Roberts v Tishman Speyer
Service Animals
Statute Of Limitations
Tenant Rights
Urstadt Law
News
COURT OF APPEALS LIMITS LUXURY DEREGULATION IN J-51 BUILDINGS.
October 22nd, 2009 The Court of Appeals ruled today in Roberts v. Tishman Speyer that rent-stabilized apartments in buildings receiving J-51 tax benefits are not subject to luxury deregulation. This ruling will affect several groups of tenants. First, tenants who are presently in a luxury deregulation proceeding in a J-51 building will have direct and immediate benefit. Second, tenants whose apartments were already luxury deregulated and moved out of a J-51 building as a result may have claims based on the ruling. And third, those whose apartments have been luxury deregulated in a J-51 building and who have remained, now paying a rent likely well in excess of their rent-stabilized rent, may have substantial overcharge claims and a right to return to the pre-luxury-deregulation rent. As appears from the majority opinion’s final paragraph, the court left open issues concerning statutes of limitation, retroactivity and other issues. It is thus important to seek counsel promptly.